Latest Post

Punitive Damages: Will they be enforced in a foreign court?

New Offshore "Asset Protection" Devices To Know

 
 

Categories

General IAR News

IAR Articles

 
 

RSS Subscribe

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

 
 

The People

Charles M. Baum
David E. Beker
Richard M. Bendix, Jr
B. Wayne Creel
Robert B. Groholski
Robert D. Nachman
Arika J. Osacky
Eric S. Rein
Michelle K. Schindler
Bethany N. Schols
Patrick T. Stanton
 
 

Case Studies

Borrower Goes Missing with Loan Proceeds

 
 

About Schwartz Cooper

Schwartz Cooper's asset recovery professionals know how to find the money, with extensive experience in coordinating and pursuing recovery of claims and judgments throughout the world.

read more

 
 
 

[« Cayman Islands Court Rules On Foreign Bankruptcy Orders] [HOME] [CHOOSE YOUR JURISDICTION WISELY »]

Collecting Debts from Bankrupt Foreign Companies
December 21, 2007

Creditors of bankrupt foreign companies may have an alternative remedy in United States courts for recovering their debts. A recent case in the Southern District of New York, Osanitsch v. Marconi PLC, 363 B.R. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2007), addressed the procedure for filing claims against foreign companies that have declared bankruptcy in a country other than the United States.

When a foreign company files bankruptcy in its home country, often it will file an ancillary proceeding in the U.S. under Section 304 (now Chapter 15) of the Bankruptcy Code. The purpose of such ancillary proceeding is to “facilitate centralized liquidation of the debtor’s estate according to the rules of the debtor’s home country.” Osanitsch v. Marconi PLC, 363 B.R. 361, 364 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). In an ancillary proceeding, as in Osanitsch, the foreign debtor can request and the U.S. court can grant an injunction prohibiting creditors from filing or continuing various lawsuits against the debtor.

Such an ancillary proceeding also gives the U.S. bankruptcy court jurisdiction to hear actions that preserve, protect or recover property of the foreign debtor. However, in Osanitsch, the district court found that section 304 (now chapter 15) does not necessarily give the US bankruptcy courts jurisdiction to hear actions brought by U.S. creditors that are unrelated to preservation or recovery of the debtor’s property. Osanitsch, 363 B.R. at 365. Thus, if a court has granted a broad sweeping injunction prohibiting the creditor’s claims and the bankruptcy court does not have jurisdiction to hear the claim, a US creditor then has limited means within the U.S. by which to recover its debt. However, the court in Osanitsch held that if a U.S. creditor wishes to recover a debt against a foreign bankrupt, it may be able to seek a modification of the injunction and ask the court to allow it to pursue its claim in other US courts. Osanitsch, 363 B.R. at 367-68. Consequently, requesting a modification of the injunction to allow the creditor’s claims may provide an alternative avenue for recovering debts from a foreign debtor.

For more information see Osanitsch v. Marconi PLC, 363 B.R. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).


Posted at 12:08 PM | Permalink

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





[« Cayman Islands Court Rules On Foreign Bankruptcy Orders] [HOME] [CHOOSE YOUR JURISDICTION WISELY »]

 
 
  Attorney Advertising. Copyright 2006 Schwartz Cooper Chartered. All rights reserved.
© 2006 by Schwartz Cooper Chartered, 180 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted to view, store, print, reproduce and distribute for non-commercial purposes any pages within this Website, provided that none
of the pages are modified and that this page is included with any such storage, printing, reproduction or distribution. [Disclaimer] [Home]